In a provocative and controversial move, acclaimed screenwriter and playwright Aaron Sorkin has suggested that the Democratic Party should nominate Republican Senator Mitt Romney as its presidential candidate to defeat Donald Trump. Sorkin, known for his work on “The West Wing” and “The Social Network,” made his case in a guest essay for the New York Times, sparking a wide range of reactions from political commentators and the public.
Sorkin’s proposal is grounded in his belief that Romney, a former GOP presidential candidate and current Utah senator, could attract enough Republican voters to secure a decisive victory over Trump. He argues that nominating Romney would send a powerful message that the election is about preventing Trump, whom he describes as “a deranged man,” from regaining power. According to Sorkin, this move would not only be a grand gesture but also a necessary sacrifice to protect the country’s future.
Sorkin’s essay paints a stark picture of the current political landscape, emphasizing the unique threat he believes Trump poses to American democracy. He writes, “Nominating Mr. Romney would be putting our money where our mouth is: a clear and powerful demonstration that this election isn’t about what our elections are usually about, but about stopping a deranged man from taking power.”
Romney, who has been a vocal critic of Trump, was the only Republican senator to vote to convict Trump during his first impeachment trial in 2020. Sorkin highlights Romney’s established political profile and name recognition as key advantages, suggesting that he does not need to be introduced to voters. He envisions former President Barack Obama endorsing Romney at the Democratic National Convention, framing the choice as a bipartisan effort to safeguard the nation.
Unsurprisingly, Sorkin’s suggestion has ignited a firestorm of criticism and debate. Prominent Democrats and activists have lambasted the idea, arguing that nominating a conservative like Romney, who opposes abortion rights and other progressive policies, would alienate the Democratic base. Christine Pelosi, daughter of former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, vehemently rejected the idea on social media, emphasizing that Democrats are committed to their core values and principles.
Activist Charlotte Clymer advised against even engaging with Sorkin’s op-ed, while journalist Imani Gandy criticized it as an example of “West Wing brain rot,” referencing the show’s idealistic portrayal of American politics. Many on social media echoed these sentiments, expressing disbelief and frustration at the proposal.
Adding another layer to the unfolding drama, President Joe Biden announced shortly after Sorkin’s op-ed was published that he would not seek re-election in 2024, endorsing Vice President Kamala Harris as his preferred successor. This announcement prompted Sorkin to retract his earlier suggestion, endorsing Harris instead. In a message shared by his “West Wing” actor Josh Malina, Sorkin wrote, “I take it all back. Harris for America!”
Sorkin’s bold proposal and the subsequent backlash underscore the deep divisions and high stakes in American politics today. While some appreciated the creative and unconventional thinking, many viewed it as a misguided and unrealistic approach. The controversy highlights the ongoing struggle within the Democratic Party to balance pragmatism with adherence to progressive values.
The Democratic Party faces critical decisions about its strategy and leadership. Whether Sorkin’s dramatic call for bipartisan unity will leave a lasting impact or be remembered as a fleeting moment of political theater remains to be seen. What is clear, however, is that the debate over how best to defeat Donald Trump will continue to shape the political discourse in the months to come.